Students evaluate teachers
Students evaluate teachers pros and cons, advantages and disadvantages in overview. Pros and Cons List
-
they can then do something better that some do not like
In case of honest opinion, there is a possibility that the teacher will also evaluate you badly.
Improves the relationship between teacher and student
they may feel attacked
If students have good arguments, they can take teachers hopping mad.
it is difficult to evaluate a person with numbers or a point system
Feedback is always good and helpful you know if you are good or bad
Students do not evaluate teachers objectively but subjectively according to empathy and sympathy thus students cannot evaluate teachers fairly - is not qualitative
Teachers then know how to make their teaching better.
The ratings are not always fair.
...Students learn to give constructive criticism
Teachers could become depressed
If teachers improve instruction through student feedback, students would be more engaged and motivated to participate
easy target of bullying
Teachers learn to deal with criticism
When students have different desires (e.g. one wants more discipline the other wants generosity) it only confuses the teacher.
Without grading you would hardly make an effort
simply senseless
...Young teachers might find the assessments helpful
Online you can print out worse and this can make the teacher misunderstand something and feel bad, even if the student means no harm!!!
sure thing
Teacher loses desire to teach
This would allow teachers to better design lessons
no more good togetherness in the class
It's just noble because the teachers can then design their lessons differently and maybe even give the students more self-confidence.
If teachers were to harvest an unobjective critique, they might take out their frustrations on students
...Students would also be motivated and advance lessons, getting through school material faster
When teachers are evaluated by means of apps, this is often anonymous. Therefore, teachers cannot say exactly who is bothered by something.
If it is anonymous, it may help the teacher to understand what he could do better without a student having to fear consequences.
Teachers do not need to be graded.
the teachers could do things better
Teachers might hand out better grades just to make themselves more popular.
Helps solve problems with teachers
The teacher has studied teaching and therefore does not need to be improved or graded.
...Teachers who misbehave are then confronted with it
no, just no
In general, it enhances the lessons so that all participants benefit from it.
Students may give extra good feedback due to fear of poor grading.
Teachers can respond to students individually. Ex: by providing support for understanding the lesson material.
Students place themselves in a higher position.
The teacher can work on his teaching through the feedback and it would then flow better as a result.
notes exert a lot of pressure
...Teaching methods can only change if the teacher also knows what does not fit.
Time required
Grades motivate for better performance
Teachers could be bullied away
Teachers can also sometimes know what classmates think of them
When evaluating grades, one person would have to sacrifice their afternoon. This would not be a coveted role and in the end the KS or a teacher takes it over.
Teachers can better design their lessons as a result
Perhaps parents and other teachers also evaluate
...You have to be honest otherwise it's stupid
Teachers will be disappointed with the criticism from their classmates and will get angry
The teachers could take revenge on the students this way!
If it is not digital it creates a lot of waste which I think is unnecessary and bad for the environment.
teachers should know how their students think about them
Privacy
Some students are more honest when the assessment is done anonymously
strangers can judge teachers badly even without any reason
...Teachers can improve as long as the evaluation is fair and honest
Students are not qualified enough to evaluate teachers. How do you know if they are doing it fairly or subjectively judging by liking?
Teachers also need to feel again how it feels to get bad grades
If it's anonymous, students will give you extra bad marks to teachers because they got bad marks from them themselves.
Then the teachers know what they could do better.
Students may not give an honest opinion because they may have received a bad grade from the teacher.
Discriminatory, racist teachers could be identified and terminatedn
Teachers would suck up to students specifically to get a better grade.
...best anonymous so that many contras would fail
Simply unnecessary
Students would confide in teachers more.
The organization is difficult bsp: How often, from which grade, how is assessed (grades or scale from 1-10).
It is high time that teachers understand that they cannot insult and torment students on a daily basis without being punished.
The teacher must stand by his or her evaluation and can be called on it. The students usually evaluate anonymously and do not have to answer for it.
I think it's good when teachers evaluate students because it helps students improve.
Teachers can be angry with students
...Teachers earn a lot, so they should be able to be evaluated
Badly evaluate the teacher for revenge
students should be able to insult teachers just as teachers can insult students
One is never sure if really only students evaluate
teachers could tell other teachers and thus the school system could be improved
The students have no experience in this area and can hardly achieve Objekitvitaet. The grading would then not be justified.
For the teacher it is a feedback, so he can also improve the lesson
Evaluation is difficult
...You could give the teachers that the students like the most a higher wage
People are unique, so you can not properly evaluate them, because everyone also has different ideas
Such teachers who make a special effort are rewarded in this way
mobbing
Teachers and students will build a good relationship. In addition, students would feel more respected.
If it is not anonymous, the teachers have a bad impression of the particular student and may evaluate him worse...
Some students would find it fair
if it is not anonymous, the teacher may then evaluate unfairly
...The teacher can improve as a result
the teacher knows then who the student evaluates and then he is sad
Teachers would try harder to do good teaching
students cannot evaluate objectively because they are dependent on teachers for grades
i find that the students can find the teacher much nicer and then he has a grade
The teacher would no longer enjoy teaching the classes=lose the desire to teach.
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression
Points may be made that hurt the teacher or students may take the matter too lightly and write an exaggerated evaluation as a joke.
...It would teach students to
Teachers can be insulted or bullied, because it is anonymous and everyone can write what he wants.
Teachers would understand grade-based pressure in students more
Teachers lose their role as authority figures when they are evaluated by students, because students now have the same "power" as teachers.
The teachers are simply motivated to teach the students a lot of material
The teachers will not care much because they still get their salary as before.
Improvement of the teacher-student relationship
Some students would not be honest in the evaluation, or would make a joke and thus distort the evaluation.
...Teachers could learn from their mistakes through some feedback
Who evaluates teachers when students don't?
Then you can really wipe something in the teacher
Teachers are just teachers
It is based on reciprocity
Some children do not dare to write their own opinion because they might be bullied or teased and write what the others write.
Teachers can identify learning gaps
no
...The teacher knows which competencies the students place special emphasis on.
The relationship between a teacher and a student can deteriorate
Teachers know what they can improve as a result
Poor relationship between teacher and student when only writing with each other and not talking.
For many teachers, it would be an incentive to do better.
The relationship between teachers and their students may improve as a result
...If students have to be able to deal with criticism, why not teachers?
Teachers learn how students feel (that they also sometimes get criticism)