It no longer causes harm to the people around me
Loss of sales in restaurants
Children no longer get harm from smokers in the environment
Going out becomes less interesting even for non-smokers. Due to the constant getting up and going out, the mood suffers and communication is interrupted.
better for the environment
Restriction of personal freedom of each smoker
restaurants are more family friendly
there is "secret" smoking in the toilets, etc.
everyone has a RIGHT to clean air to breathe WITHOUT nicotine
Discrimination against smokers...
it does not stink
maybe/hopefully it will reduce the number of smokers
Smoking areas are becoming fewer and fewer, or are being eliminated completely
Smokers are unattractive
The non-smoker does not have to breathe smoke involuntarily all the time
bad for everyone...
You don't infect people who have quit smoking anymore
Smokers are deprived of the right to decide for themselves
Non smokers kiss better ;)
Less revenue from tobacco tax
on the one hand smoking endangers health. On the other hand, not good role model for the children.
It is not the state's job to dictate whether or not smoking is allowed in private homes.
Woman no longer need to wash hair after every dinner
Intervenes in the personal and private living space...
Smoking ban in all pubs, inns, bars, etc. = equal rights for all!
No one has ever given up smoking because of a ban
Smokers who demand tolerance demand that it be tolerated that they be allowed to deliberately harm the health of others!
the black market will rise
maybe some people give up smoking
Everyone should be allowed to decide for themselves!
Smoking harms the environment
against the human right...
Cigarrettes cant start a fire
Bad example to the smaller
You smell better
Smoking is harmful, but not to such an extent: It does not affect the health of others as long as you do not live with a smoker.
The smoking ban is unworthy of human rights
One protects the environment
No one at all has to go into houses where people smoke....
Passive smokers (non-smokers who inhale the smoke all day) also get sick
No more passive smokers!
the medicine will not advance
You do something good for your lungs and the whole body
you can decide for yourself if you want to stand with smokers or not
Children are born without nicotine in them if you do not smoke
less revenue for tobacco companies if not bankruptcy...
fewer passive smokers will die
Withdrawal becomes difficult for smokers (and can lead to psychological problems).
Not so pleasant for non-smokers to taste the smoke flavor when kissing a smoker
smoking is not as bad as the diesel fumes
Passive smoking can lead to respiratory problems
Do not think about your fellow man.
Other addictive substances are resorted to such as alcohol...
The pension does not have to be paid out for so long
if you earn your own money, you are allowed to spend it on cigarettes, which you are allowed to consume, whether indoors or outdoors
The improvement of the state of health
No more controls on the protection of minors when sales only go through the black market
Smoking is economically unsolidary, since the medical costs of smokers are financed by all SHI contributors and the SHI contributions increase.
Protection of non-smokers
Non-smoking in public rooms can have positive effects as a role model for children.
Stress relief through meditation or other means
better for lungs
The money that the population spends on cigarettes decreases
It only makes those richer who are already earning stupidly from cigarettes.
Smoking is a mental illness
Non-smokers do not automatically become passive smokers
The cigarette industry does not care if millions of people die from their deadly poison.
Long life expectancy
No longer stinks, does not bother other people,